Skip to content
Fremantle Cornice Internal Corner and Length

Cornice Material Comparison

The benefits of using a lightweight alternative in volume building is beyond a simple material cost saving. There are substantial efficiencies in the installation and finishing process.

 

Easier handling and installation, quicker curing and drying times, lower defect ratio and lower waste are all factors that combine to create faster and cost-effective outcomes without compromising on finish quality.

 

The below table offers estimated comparison values sourced from a range of datapoints across the web. Note that these comparisons are to be considered high-level guidance, as various factors contribute to outcomes in different markets.

Foam vs Plaster Cornice Material Comparison Table

CriteriaDS4 Decor XPS CornicePlaster Cornice
Installation Time2–3 LM/hour1–1.5 LM/hour
Crew Requirements1 finisher + 1 labourer
(can be installed by single person)
Skilled plasterer + apprentice
Cure Time / ReworkNone, paint-ready in <1 day24–72 hrs drying + sanding
Finish QualityGood (with minor caulking) to
Excellent (with lightweight filler finishing)
Excellent (seamless)
DurabilityGreater moisture resitance
& movement tollerance
Greater impact resistance
Waste Factor~5–7% (Offcuts)~10–15% (Offcuts, Wet Mix)
Labour AvailabilityEasier to staff
(Semi-skilled & non-plastering trades OK)
Dependent on skilled wet finishers
Damage During InstallBrittle (can chip) but light & easy to handleFragile and heavy — breakage risk
Defect LiabilityEasy to patch with lightweight fillerHarder to blend repairs post-installation
Environmental

Lower embodied energy

Made from recycled material

Waste fully recycleable

High energy input (cement, lime), recyclable
Typical Install Time
(80 – 100LM Home)
Install: 1-2 Days
Drying / Cure : > 1 Day
Defects / Rework : Low
Install: 3-5 Days
Drying / Cure : > 2-3 Days
Defects / Rework : Med-High

Sources